I knew that I had to swallow my pride, that I had to be a man – that I had to stand up and confess to hundreds of people that I was wrong, that what I taught them on my video were false doctrines of GOD and His SON. Now I have to present the evidence that explains why I was wrong. I have now seen the true light that reveals I am now right in proving there is ONLY ONE ALMIGHTY TRUE GOD and not three Gods. Truly, there is just ONE person who conceived His one and only begotten SON, Jesus, the Christ.
This undeniable, indisputable fact, clearly proves the HOLY Spirit who conceived the ONE and only BEGOTTEN SON of GOD the Christ, was the ONE TRUE ALMIGHTY GOD Himself, and not a third separate person.
In this article, I will explore the many scriptures found throughout the Bible, which are often used by Trinitarians to prove that the ONE TRUE GOD is not one person but THREE, called the Trinity.
Here, from 1 to 100, I will make a quick reference revealing the true meanings and definitions under every Trinitarian scripture used by the Trinity faith.
I am the Witness, while you are the Jurors, who will finally decide whether the scriptures that the Trinitarians believe actually prove the Trinity, or whether the alternative meanings, definitions, facts, and evidence I will present can prove the Trinity to be false.
I will provide all scriptures as a witness to prove that GOD’s SON was telling the truth, when He taught He truly was GOD's begotten SON and did not send Himself but did His Fathers will.
Follow me, and you will see, there is not one single verse that proves the trinity.
We will kick this off with 1 John 5:7, which is a perfect scripture that would prove the Trinity without doubt.
For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.
1 John 5:7, King James Bible.
Follow me and you will see, how dishonest people are trying to fool you and me.
The real truth is that 1 John 5:7 is not so perfect, and it has actually been found to be a forgery in the King James Bible, which many Greek Scholars agree on. In reality, this 1 John 5:7 verse is missing from the original Greek manuscripts, and was added to the Bible at a later date, apparently with the sole purpose to make people believe in the false trinity.
I think the lesson here is that you shouldn’t believe everything you read – you should instead be smart, much like the Berean Jews who examined the scriptures daily:
Now these Jews were more noble than those in Thessalonica; they received the word with all eagerness, examining the Scriptures daily to see if these things were so. 1 John 5:7.
Already we can see that something fishy’s been going on to fool you and me. You can read more below on this called the: Comma Johanneum.
Many Trinitarians tell me that Matthew 28:19 proves the trinity:
There are Bible scholars who believe that Matthew 28:19 is another forgery, and that the original words said by Jesus only feature the line: “Go ye and make disciples of all the nations in my name.” (Jesus). The scholars believe that this has been changed by adding in ‘The Father and The Holy Spirit’.
But how can we be sure that Matthew 28:19 is, in fact, another forgery? Remember to follow the example of the Berean Jews, and to search the scriptures daily, as Jesus confirmed: We will find if we seek. Matthew 7:7.
With that in mind, when we search the scriptures, what do we find wrong with Matthew 28:19?
There is not one single account written in the Bible of Jesus’ disciples and the first Christians baptizing in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit. Instead, every scripture we read in the New Testament reveals that people were baptized into the name of the Lord Jesus only.
So what do you think? Well, let’s have a look and see (the following are all from the English Standard Version).
For he had not yet fallen on any of them, but they had only been baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus. Acts 8:16.
On hearing this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus. Acts 19:5.
And Peter said to them, “Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins, and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.” Acts 2:38.
And he commanded them to be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ. Then they asked him to remain for some days. Acts 10:48
As we can clearly see, the baptizing was only done in the name of Jesus, not the Father nor the Holy Spirit.
Even more evidence can be found in the fact that Saint Jerome had access to a copy of the original Hebrew of Matthew’s Gospel. (This has been taken from the book, A Catalogue of Fathers of the Church and Ecclesiastical Writers to the Fifteenth Century, published in 1850 by C.J. Stewart).
In this original Gospel, all that is recorded is the following: “Go ye and make disciples of all the nations in my name.” (Jesus).
As we can clearly see, yet again the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit are missing.
See External Links below on: Trinity: Examining Authenticity Of Matthew 28:19.
So, once more we have some fishy business going on here. Why and who changed the scriptures by adding in: ‘of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit’, which was clearly there just to promote the trinity doctrine?
“Many Jesus' Name believers claim the development of baptism "in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost" is a post-Apostolic interpolation and corruption. Some claim that the "Trinitarian" clause in Matthew 28:19 was added to Matthew's text in the 2nd/3rd century. They cite as evidence that no record exists in the New Testament of someone being baptized with the Trinitarian formula.
4. Matthew 28:19 text, Baptism in the New Testament, G.R. Beasley-Murray, p 83.” (Wikipedia).
As far as I am aware, 1 John 5:7 and Matthew 28:19 are the two main forgeries that have been discovered so far against the trinity.
We will now move on to the two most misunderstood yet greatest sayings of Jesus in all history: John 8:58 and John 10:30. From the very lips of Jesus himself, was he claiming to be God?
Let us look at the scriptures for the truth.
Trinitarians say and believe that in this scripture Jesus was referring to Himself, when GOD said “I am who I am” In Exodus 3:14. Therefore, because of this, Trinitarians believe that Jesus was claiming to be THE GOD.
I think we should delve in a little deeper here, and right away we can notice four important facts:
Jesus did not say the whole sentence as it was said: “I AM WHO I AM” in Exodus 3:14.
Jesus only said “I am”, which is simply not the same as Exodus 3:14.
“I am” was a popular saying, and can actually be found in the Bible over 700 times.
The conversation between the Jews and Jesus was about Jesus confirming that He’d already existed before Abraham was born. This can be seen when the Jews said: Thou art not yet fifty years old, and hast thou seen Abraham? John 8:57.
This adds up perfectly with the LEXICON translation, which clearly reveals the “I am”: εἰμί eimi. The definition here means “I exist”, which does not translate as having always existed. This is made perfectly clear in Colossians 1:15 to 18, as Jesus is the first-born, proving that He did not always exist.
There are many scriptures proving that Jesus existed before creation, (Please see below), but not ONE saying that Jesus had always existed.
“I am” is the Greek idiom for “I am he,” or “I am the one”. Did the blind man in 9:9 say, “I am God”?! “It’s me” is the meaning, as everyone should know.
The conversation between Jesus and the Jews would be completely out of context if Jesus was saying: I AM THE SAME PERSON AS THE ONE TRUE GOD, because the Jews were telling Jesus Abraham was born before Him, in which He rectified them.
Trinitarians say and believe that in this scripture of John 10:30, Jesus was referring to Himself, and His Father GOD as being ONE GOD.
I think we need to look at this some more, and there are three important facts to notice:
Jesus never said: I AND THE FATHER ARE ONE GOD.
But instead said: I AND THE FATHER ARE ONE.
These are not the same.
The Trinity doctrine teaches that there are THREE persons in the GODHEAD, and that the third person of the Godhead is the Holy Spirit. Yet the so-called third person of the Godhead of the Holy Spirit is not mentioned in John 10:30.
Why would Jesus leave out (and not even mention) such an important person of the Holy Spirit, if the person was indeed a separate person?
Now, the question becomes: if Jesus did not mean He and the Father are ONE GOD, then what did He mean?
WHAT DID JESUS MEAN WHEN HE SAID: I AND THE FATHER ARE ONE. John 10:30.
Most are confused with what Jesus said and meant here, and in their confusion they believe this proves that Jesus and the Father are, in fact, ONE GOD.
When I was a deceived Trinitarian for 10 years, I was one of those who misunderstood this to believe that Jesus meant He and GOD are ONE GOD, and I used the same TRINITY scriptures to support the Trinity, because I believed what I was taught by other deceived TRINITY teachers, instead of doing my own research, which is the same problem with most Trinitarians today.
However, then I changed my mind. I came to understand that this so-called statement contradicts Jesus’ own teachings – many, many times throughout the Bible – when Jesus said that He is the SON of God and there is only ONE true GOD, meaning (ALWAYS EXISTED), who has always been.
When a man and a woman come together in marriage, it is said that they become ONE and the same, and ONE in substance.
However, they are NEVER the same person; they are always two completely separate people.
Jesus prayed to His Father, GOD, asking that He and His disciples could also become ONE:
Holy Father, keep them in your name, which you have given me, THAT THEY MAY BE ONE, EVEN AS WE ARE ONE. John 17:11.
I do not ask for these only, but also for those who will believe in me through their word, 21 THAT THEY MAY ALL BE ONE, JUST AS YOU, FATHER, ARE IN ME, AND I IN YOU, that they also may be in us. John 17:20.
Here it is clear Jesus prayed that GOD and His disciples would all become in complete agreement, and in harmony they would join together as a family, just as Jesus has ONE purpose with His Father, God – to be in complete agreement, harmony, and purpose, just as he desires to make all God’s children ONE substance.
We will return to John 1:1 shortly, when I will reveal to you another hidden secret.
But first I want to ask this very serious question: have there been dishonest people right from the very beginning who have been adding and deleting words in the Holy Bible?
Well, 1 John 5:7 and Matthew 28:19 are both examples that this is certainly the case, and I know that many other scriptures have been altered to make Jesus into GOD – I will reveal these soon.
Many people have confessed to having changed their minds on this subject; there are many dedicated Trinitarian Greek Bible experts and scholars who have come forward for many reasons, one of them being that the King James Bible was edited by a Roman Catholic priest and humanist, named Erasmus.
On Dan Corner’s website (Dan Corner is another dedicated Trinitarian whose site features a lot of information about Erasmus), he states:
“The KJV is based on the Textus Receptus, which was formulated by Erasmus and edited by Stephanus and Beza. Erasmus was a Roman Catholic priest, who died a faithful Catholic. Erasmus dedicated his edition of the Greek New Testament to Pope Leo X. Erasmus depended mostly upon two twelfth-century manuscripts and had no Greek manuscript, which contained the last six verses of the book of Revelation. He translated those verses from the Latin Vulgate into Greek. Erasmus wrote of Mary as ‘my salvation’ and ‘my refuge.’ Furthermore, he wished for ‘salvation through Jesus, but not without his Mother’."
Here is a small part of Dan Corner’s research with the link to his full article: http://www.evangelicaloutreach.org/kjvonly.htm
Jude 1:4 is a perfect scripture that seems to make this point very clear.
In an article called What Is Messiah? Jewish Messiah or Christian God by Rick Richardson, he writes:
In his article Cosmic Codebreaker, Pious Heretic, about Sir Isaac Newton (for Christian History Magazine), Karl Giberson writes: “Newton began a sustained reflection on the Christian doctrines and decided that the Anglican status quo was a thorough corruption of the true, original Christianity.
These considerations led him to write over a million words on theology and biblical studies—more than he wrote on any other subject. “Newton's theological investigations convinced him that the doctrine of the Trinity was bogus, a successful deception by St. Athanasius in the fourth century.
Newton argued that the Scriptures had been altered and early Christian writers had been misquoted to make it appear that Trinitarianism had been the original faith.”
Below is a Christian, who used to be like me – a Trinitarian – and who did the same as me: he opened his eyes and researched the trinity, discovering it to be false. In an article on the subject, he wrote:
“The truth and the facts to the matter is very clearly expressed in the words of Prof. Bart D. Ehrman in his book, The Orthodox Corruption of Scripture, where he warns us that: ‘...theological disputes, specifically disputes over Christology, prompted Christian scribes to alter the words of scripture in order to make them more serviceable for the polemical task. Scribes modified their manuscripts to make them more patently ‘orthodox’ and less susceptible to ‘abuse’ by the opponents of orthodoxy’ -- which orthodoxy was to bring the text of the Bible into conformity with the doctrines and tenets of the Church of the Roman Emperor Constantine. To close our hearts and minds to the facts, and ignore the truth, is from a New Covenant perspective synonymous with relinquishing any claim whatsoever with respect to being a follower of Jesus.”
You can find the full article below by reluctant-messenger.com biblical-corruption.
Now, back to John 1:1.
It seems clear to me that there have also been dishonest persons playing about with the true words of St John here in the end of John 1:1c.
But what about the confusion surrounding John 1:1c, which so many people believe proves that Jesus is GOD? Well, this is to do with John 1:1c reading AND THE WORD WAS GOD.
First, if I may, I’d like to bring this important fact to your attention: this verse is one of the most popular scriptures used by Trinitarians who believe that it means and prove that Jesus is GOD.
Sadly, because millions of Trinitarians do not do any research, and therefore just believe what they are taught about the trinity – much like being told that Father Christmas delivers our presents down the chimney when we’re children – they do not learn the truth: that there are many different translations of John 1:1c that do not say that Jesus is THE GOD.
Before we move forward, please may I make you aware of these different translations of John 1:1c?
What millions don’t seem to understand is the fact that there are other variations of John 1:1 which also exist, but which aren’t as well-known as they seem to be hidden, and are not in the Bible we hold in our hands today.
What we see is ONE simple letter – the ‘a’ – missing from the end of John 1:1c, which then makes Jesus into a God, and NOT THE GOD.
Why don’t we have a look at what many don’t see?
It is interesting to know that Biblical scholar Benjamin Wilson’s translation of the Greek New Testament shows that there was an ‘a’ before:
"In a beginning was the Word, and the Word was with the God, and a god was the word." John 1:1, DGT.
Other variations of rendering John 1:1 also exist:
In 1966 and 2001, The Good News Bible reads: "...and he was the same as God."
In 1970 and 1989, The Revised English Bible reads: "...and what God was, the Word was."
In 1808, we have: “and the Word was a god” Thomas Belsham, The New Testament, in An Improved Version, Upon the Basis of Archbishop Newcome’s New Translation: With a Corrected Text, London.
In 1864 there is: “and a god was the Word” The Emphatic Diaglott by Benjamin Wilson, New York and London (left hand column interlinear reading).
In 1935, “and the Word was divine” The Bible – An American Translation, by John M. P. Smith and Edgar J. Goodspeed, Chicago.
In 1955 we have: “so the Word was divine” The Authentic New Testament, by Hugh J. Schonfield, Aberdeen.
In 1978, “and godlike sort was the Logos” Das Evangelium nach Johannes, by Johannes Schneider, Berlin.
In 1822, "and the Word was a god." The New Testament in Greek and English (A. Kneeland, 1822).
In 1863 it reads: "and the Word was a god." A Literal Translation Of The New Testament (Herman Heinfetter [Pseudonym of Frederick Parker], 1863).
In 1885, "and the Word was a god." Concise Commentary On The Holy Bible (R. Young, 1885).
1879 – "and the Word was a god." Das Evangelium nach Johannes (J. Becker, 1979).
In 1911, "and the Word was a god." The Coptic Version of the N.T. (G. W. Horner, 1911).
1958 reads: "and the Word was a god." The New Testament of Our Lord and Saviour Jesus Anointed (J. L. Tomanec, 1958).
In 1829 we have: "and the Word was a god." The Monotessaron; or, The Gospel History According to the Four Evangelists (J. S. Thompson, 1829).
In 1975, "and the Word was a god." Das Evangelium nach Johannes (S. Schulz, 1975).
In 1962 and 1979 we have: "the word was God." Or, more literally, 'God was the word.' The Four Gospels and the Revelation (R. Lattimore, 1979).
In 1975, “and a god (or, of a divine kind) was the Word.” Das Evangelium nach Johnnes, by Siegfried Schulz, Göttingen, Germany.
Most people do not understand that the translation of John 1:1c that says ‘The word was GOD’, is a wrong translation, and this is why I have added in the different translations above to show you the real translation:
“and a god” or “and the Word was divine.” or Simpy is God, but clearly NOT THE GOD.
From my own research, however, I favour the translation of: "and the Word was a god."
But why? you may ask. Well, it’s because of what Jesus said in JOHN 34 -36, when he refers to Psalm 82:6 which states: “I said, ‘You are gods, sons of the Most High, all of you’.” Here, Jesus was referring to ‘gods’ as in the sense of Magistrates, Prophets, and judges, who are appointed by the word of GOD.
Jesus WAS referring to HIS DEITY; he was NOT claiming to be as GOD THE FATHER (who always existed) but as ‘a God’ like Magistrates, Prophets, and judges, appointed by GOD.
Of course, Jesus is more than a God as we understand Gods; he is the second greatest in the universe under His Father, GOD, which He confirmed by His own lips when He said: for the Father is greater than I. John 14:28.
On that note, we finish with this week’s study to see that Jesus confirmed He was less then His Father GOD, proving He was NOT GOD.
This is also confirmed in Hebrews 1:9, where GOD called Jesus ‘God’. You need to bear in mind that the Bible was written in capitals so there was no way to distinguish the difference between GOD and God and also that the scriptures have been through countless different scribes over the years, and dishonest ones as well.
I am Simon Brown.
Comma Johanneum: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comma_Johanneum
Committed Trinitarian, and GREEK scholar Dr James White admit that 1 John 5 7, Mark 16 9-20 and John 7 53-8 11 ARE FORGERIES? https://youtu.be/GYkPn2aXKds
Here is evidence of the short version of Matthew 28:19 being used and not the long version.
Please also read: Trinity: Examining Authenticity Of Matthew 28:19. https://discover-the-truth.com/2013/08/05/trinity-investigating-the-authenticity-of-matthew-2819/
Trinity: The Truth About Matthew 28:19 & 1 John 5:7 https://discover-the-truth.com/2013/07/26/trinity-the-truth-about-matthew-2819-1-john-57/