Simon Brown.

All articles and research about GOD, on my web sites and this blog are about the ONE TRUE Father GOD, who is the GOD of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, who’s personal covenant name is Yahweh.

As are all my articles and research about Jesus, are under His covenant name of the begotten Son’s personal name of Yeshua.

It is not my purpose to force you to agree or believe with what's on my websites, but rather to share my research.
As the record goes. I'm Just a soul who's intentions are good. Oh Lord, please don't let me be misunderstood. I am Simon Brown. Amen.

Anyone with ears to hear should listen and understand! Matthew 11:15.
Who is he that overcometh the world, but he that believeth that Jesus is the
SON of God?
1 John 5:5.
NOT GOD OR A TRINITY, but as St john has said: but he that believeth that Jesus is the SON of God? 1 John 5:5.
And as Jesus has said: ETERNAL LIFE is believing His Father GOD is the only ONE TRUE GOD alone. John 17:3. Which is the FIRST commandment one MUST believe. Mark 12:29.


Dear friends, just to remind you, as I am a human being, I am capable of making mistakes. If you believe I am wrong, don't let it go, but please be kind and let me know. Thank you.

But examine everything carefully; hold fast to that which is good. 1 Thessalonians 5:21.



Saturday, 20 August 2016

Join us as we visit The Westminster Abbey and see Sir Isaac Newton and Charles Darwin's grave and look at The missing link.

Westminster-Abbey.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3AWestminster-Abbey.JPG

By Σπάρτακος (Own work) [CC BY-SA 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

In this weeks article:
Our trip to Westminster Abbey
Sir Isaac Newton’s grave.
Charles Darwin’s grave.
My Short explanation on the missing link.
Are Atheist Professors clever?
Short description of Westminster Abbey.
My short debate with Trinitarian Reverend Mark Laine Smith, a Duty Chaplin at Westminster Abbey where my wife Emma discovered contradictions in the TRINITY faith.


A while back we went to Sir Isaac Newton’s home and town, followed by a trip last week to the famous Westminster Abbey in central London where my wife Emma and I decided to finish off following Sir Isaac Newton to his resting place.
 Sir Isaac Newton’s memorial above his grave.
 Sir Isaac Newton’s memorial above his grave.
Photos by
http://www.westminster-abbey.org/visit-us/picture-gallery

Our main interest was to visit Sir Isaac Newton’s grave 
 Sir Isaac Newton’s memorial above his grave. Photos by http://www.westminster-abbey.org/visit-us/picture-gallery
 Sir Isaac Newton’s memorial above his grave.
Photos by
http://www.westminster-abbey.org/visit-us/picture-gallery

And as we were there we looked for the main promoter of evolution who is Charles Darwin.

I am so excited to report to you this amazing find my wife made which became more interesting then seeing Sir Isaac Newton’s grave.
Because we met a Reverend Mark who was working in the Westminster Abbey who talks to the visitors there, so I talked to him about his Trinity faith and while Emma was listening she made a new discovery about the Trinity faith.

Please read on, as I will do my best to explain what Emma discovered shortly.
First I would like to share our photos and take you on a trip to experience one of the most popular tourist sites in London, the famous Westminster Abbey.

Now the big problem is photos are prohibited in the Abbey which is a real shame, and I was nearly kicked out of the Abbey for taking these photos of me below standing on the head of Sir Isaac Newton’s grave and Charles Darwin's.
Simon Brown at Sir Isaac Newton's grave.
Photo of Simon Brown at Sir Isaac Newton's grave. 
Sir Isaac Newton is actually buried only 3 foot down from my foot I am told. 
Sir Isaac Newton's grave.



And what is interesting is only 18 feet away there lays a person who was completely the opposite in faith; the famous Charles Darwin also buried 3 feet under my feet.
Photo of Simon Brown at Charles Darwin's grave.
Photo of Simon Brown at Charles Darwin's grave. 

How very interesting to see one of history’s greatest genius, English physicist and mathematician Sir Isaac Newton who believed in creation by God, described in his own day as a "natural philosopher" who is widely recognised as one of the most influential scientists of all time and as a key figure in the scientific revolution. 
Although the laws of motion and universal gravitation became Newton's best-known discoveries, he warned against using them to view the Universe as a mere machine, as if akin to a great clock. He said, "Gravity explains the motions of the planets, but it cannot explain who set the planets in motion. God governs all things and knows all that is or can be done. Reff: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.




Yet it’s puzzling to understand why most of the world’s population refuse to believe Sir Isaac Newton, when he was one of the greatest scientists who ever lived, but prefer to believe Charles Darwin who’s only degree was in theology.
He believed our first parents were ape’s which is still today an unproven theory because of the missing link between man and ape still happens to be missing.

Apparently Charles Darwin was a liar when he was a schoolboy who invented gratuitous fibs to his schoolmates and boasted that he could change the colour of flowers by watering them with certain coloured fluids. Ref. THE DARWIN PAPERS.



The missing link.
Atheist scientist even admit and confess the missing link between man and ape is still missing and yet cannot understand a very simple fact, that the link between human and ape revealing transition never existed in the beginning, which is why they cannot find it, yet they are still desperately looking for an impossible, invisible theory to prove their unproven faith, and ignore and refuse to believe the Palaeontologist ''who do not believe in God'' who have proven there is NO evidence for evolution and the evolution theories are not correct.

Are Atheist Professors clever?
How can certain atheist today like Professor Brian Cox be that clever if people like him cannot even work out a simple fact that NO living creature has ever been proved to jump from one species to another.
The fossil record clearly proves the Trilobites have NO ancestors, revealing NO transition, NO transformation, NO adaptation, NO changeover to other organisms or creatures.
The Cambrian explosion in the fossil record. Ancient trilobites fossils in stone. 07-08-13 ©Zheka-Boss. Copyright ©2014 iStockphoto LP.
The Cambrian explosion in the fossil record. Ancient trilobites fossils in stone. 07-08-13 ©Zheka-Boss. Copyright ©2014 iStockphoto LP. 
We in fact do NOT see any organisms or creatures changing from one state or condition to another called Evolution. All confirmed as a time capsule in the fossil record.
The Cambrian Explosion proved and confirmed by the fossil record that the single-celled organisms have no evidence of changing.
Because it suddenly went from a single-celled organisms and leaped into a full-blown arthropod with a complete body and highly complicated eyes and organs called a Trilobite.
If the theory of evolution was correct, we could do the same action and concept as numbers, count and start them from 1 to 100. Just as 100 numbers. In every number as it counts up we would see a minor change. Until we see every living creature has transformed into every living arthropod, insect, and animal living today or discovered in the fossil record.

But the evolutionist are still in a state of desperation trying many ways to deceive people from believing it was a mastermind GOD who created every living creature, who have gone to the extreme to fool the world into thinking we are animals, by gluing human skulls to chimpanzee jaws, to painting pig's teeth so they look old and then gluing it to a human skull, and even gluing two fossils together to make us believe birds came from dinosaurs. 
Photo. A nonsense: Chris Stringer holds a reconstruction of Piltdown Man's skull HOAX.
Photo. A nonsense: Chris Stringer holds a reconstruction of Piltdown Man's skull HOAX.

Piltdown Man: A hoaxer still pursued. By Jonathan Amos Science correspondent, BBC News. 
By Jonathan Amos Science correspondent, BBC News



12-13 © allanswart. Copyright ©2014 iStockphoto LP.
There are more chances of PIGS learning to fly then the chance of EVOLUTION. And yet there are now millions of Christians who also believe in EVOLUTION. 
I wonder if these type of Christians who also believe in EVOLUTION believe GOD is an APE?




Richard Dawkins.
Then there are the atheist like Richard Dawkins who have discovered the unproven theory of evolution is a lucrative business which is just a good way of conning money out of sad people before some do their home work and discover what they were conned into believing was the missing link, is now the found link which turned out to be 100% animal or 100% human and is in fact not a found link but still the missing link and a GREAT FORGERY.

You are welcome to read more of my research: THE SO CALLED ''MISSING LINKS'' TO EVOLUTION. THAT FOOLED THE DUMB SCIENTIST. http://wwwrealdiscoveriesorg-simon.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/the-so-called-missing-links-to.html
Or watch my video below.



Short description of Westminster Abbey.
I would like to give you some back ground info about this incredible impressive 
Westminster Abbey.


I was told there is 30300 famous bodies berried there. 
Westminster Abbey is literally a luxurious indoor graveyard for the famous.
The-tomb-of-Elizabeth
The-tomb-of-Elizabeth
Photo by
http://www.westminster-abbey.org/visit-us/picture-gallery

Here’s some info from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Please meet me again shortly where I will explain what my wife Emma discovered and how.

Westminster Abbey
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Westminster Abbey, formally titled the Collegiate Church of St Peter at Westminster, is a large, mainly Gothic abbey church in the City of Westminster, London, just to the west of the Palace of Westminster. It is one of the United Kingdom's most notable religious buildings and the traditional place of coronation and burial site for English and, later, British monarchs. Between 1540 and 1556 the abbey had the status of a cathedral. Since 1560, however, the building is no longer an abbey nor a cathedral, having instead the status of a Church of England "Royal Peculiar"—a church responsible directly to the sovereign. The building itself is the original abbey church.
According to a tradition first reported by Sulcard in about 1080, a church was founded at the site (then known as Thorn Ey (Thorn Island)) in the 7th century, at the time of Mellitus, a Bishop of London. Construction of the present church began in 1245, on the orders of King Henry III.[4]
Since 1066, when Harold Godwinson and William the Conqueror were crowned, the coronations of English and British monarchs have been held there.[5][6] There have been at least 16 royal weddings at the abbey since 1100. Two were of reigning monarchs (Henry I and Richard II), although, before 1919, there had been none for some 500 years.[7]


Last weeks article: Why do most Trinitarians believe all the church Fathers believed in the TRINITY?

Last week I did my best to demonstrate how an old Trinitarian friend made claims about the Trinity faith by saying all the church fathers believed in the 
Trinity to which they say to justify what they believe.
But I pointed out when researched properly this turned out to be completely false.
If you missed the article please click here.


This week I am writing about what happen at Westminster Abbey which turned out to be an amazing testimony we were both not expecting that caused my wife Emma to start believing my research on the doctrine of Trinity.


Now it is not a cheap day out to visit Westminster Abbey with just under a 2 hour drive if the traffic is good from our home and if you are lucky to find a park in central London it will cost £13 for just 2 hours and then £20 each for admission into the Abbey.


However my wife is disabled and phoned the Abbey to find out if there were any disabled parking. We were delighted to hear a member of the Abbey say admission for her was free, and it was very unusual but in her case they would let us park in a VIP car park at the Abbey.
When we arrived at the gates they had a VIP entrance card waiting for us so we could park.
As we entered the Westminster Abbey I handed over my £20 entrance fee, to then hear them saying I could also go in for free. 
Was GOD looking down on us?


When Emma my wife and I started looking around in this incredible Westminster Abbey, I lost her, then after a while, when I found her she was talking to a Priest-vicar who we were not expecting to meet and talk too who was such a delightful man who was a Trinitarian, Reverend Mark Laine Smith, a Duty Chaplin at Westminster Abbey.


My short debate with Trinitarian Reverend Mark Laine Smith, a Duty Chaplin at Westminster Abbey.
I then started asking Reverend Mark Laine Smith, what he believed which ended up as a debate on the Trinity.
I asked him did he believe the Trinity doctrine, which is ONE GOD who are THREE persons?


He said NO. 
I said but I am confused because if you go on the many Trinity websites they all say the same and make this point very clear which is the foundations of their Trinity faith that the doctrine of the Trinity defines God as three consubstantial persons.


As my wife was listening to the conversation, he then told me not to go on Trinity websites and not to believe what Trinity websites teach.


I said to him, and then what do you believe if you are a Trinitarian who believes in the Trinity?
He said He believes in ONE GOD who is ONE person, which are Father, son and Holy Spirit.
And NOT in ONE GOD who is THREE persons as the Trinity doctrine defines who are Father, Son and Holy Spirit.


What I heard him say shocked me so much I wondered if I needed to inspect my ears to see if they were blocked up with wax, which could be causing me to hear incorrectly.


So I repeated what he said to me back to him, when he then confirmed my ears were not blocked but working very well.


I said to him, so you do not believe what the Trinity teaches that the doctrine of the Trinity defines GOD as ONE GOD as three consubstantial persons. 
He said NO, he believes all THREE are ONE GOD and ONE person.


Before we continue lets have a look to confirm and check if the Trinity doctrine does teach ONE GOD who is THREE persons as the Trinity doctrine defines.


Here is a Trinitarian web site.
What is the doctrine of the Trinity?
What does it Mean That God is a Trinity?
The doctrine of the Trinity means that there is one God who eternally exists as three distinct Persons - the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Stated differently, God is one in essence and three in person. These definitions express three crucial truths: (1) The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are distinct Persons, (2) EACH PERSON IS FULLY GOD, (3) there is only one God

.
Now lets have a look at a non-biased site like wikipedia.org.
The Christian doctrine of the Trinity (from Latin trinitas "triad", from trinus "threefold") defines God as three consubstantial persons or hypostases-the Father, the Son (Jesus Christ), and the Holy Spirit-as "one God in three Divine Persons". The three persons are DISTINCT, yet are one " Substance, essence or nature".
As we can see the main sites above make this very clear: The doctrine of the Trinity means that there is one God who eternally exists as three distinct Persons.


As Emma was listing, she than finally remembered what I have been saying right from the beginning of my research, that Trinitarians often contradict people of their own faith.


Emma finally discovered I was right, that the Trinity faith is full of black holes and contradictions who cannot agree on what they believe who contradict people of their own faith and often do not even understand what they believe.


I said to Mark why do you claim to follow Jesus and yet make Him the ONE TRUE GOD when He Himself said His Father GOD was the only ONE TRUE GOD and excluded Himself from being the ONE TRUE GOD, in John 17:3?
Mark told me that He believed Jesus did not even know Himself who He was.
That’s another new Trinitarian doctrine I have never heard.


I then asked Mark, ok please tell me did Jesus always exist?
He said yes of course.
I then said why do you Trinitarians always ignore what Colossians 1:15 teaches? Saying: He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation.
I said: This one scripture proves Jesus was BORN FIRST and before all creation, which alone proves the Trinity false.
He then went silent.


My last question to Mark.
Have you ever done any research on your Trinity faith to see where the Trinity was established from and read about the fact that the Trinity was not a doctrine until 300 years after Christ where the first Trinitarians did not destroy paganism, but instead adopted it at the: First Council of Nicaea https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Council_of_Nicaea#Nicene_Creed
This brought our debate to an end, as Mark was offended and suddenly vanished.



Thus says the LORD: “Cursed is the man who trusts in man and makes flesh his strength, whose heart turns away from the LORD. 
 Jeremiah 17:5

At this point I made a new discovery, discovering THREE new Trinitarian doctrines.
I. Jesus did not know Himself who He was, according to Mark.
2. The first time ever I discovered a Trinitarian who does not believe what the Trinity doctrine teachers that GOD is NOT three PERSONS, but instead the THREE persons are ONE person and ONE GOD.

3. Mark told me I am NOT to believe what other Trinitarians teach but to believe him who is a Trinitarian who does not believe what the Trinity teachers teach.
We are always learning.

What I already knew.
1. Before I met Mark I already believed to not believe what ANY Trinitarians believe and teach. But I have never heard Trinitarians confess this themselves.

2. Before I met Mark I already new from my long research that this is often the case and the evidence that Trinitarians contradict each other.
A tree is known by it's fruit said Jesus. As a faith is known by his works.

Conclusion.
In last weeks article, I hopefully pointed out how certain Trinitarian teachers do not research their faith properly to discover if the foundations of their Trinity faith is rock solid.

This week I have pointed out how the Trinitarians contradict their own faith and cannot agree on what they believe, and often do not understand what they believe.

And yet we are also told by Trinitarians they are filled with the Holy Spirit who teaches them the truth, and yet Trinitarian Mark who has been to university most of his life training and teaching on the Trinity states not to believe other Trinitarians because they do not teach and know the truth of the Trinity.

As we see here, this again is a perfect example revealing how very easy it is to understand Trinitarians do not agree or understand with what they themselves believe and understand who clearly contradict each other.

If you are planning to go to Westminster Abbey, ask for Reverend Mark Laine Smith.
It is interesting to know that within our debate I asked Mark did he read the research by Sir Isaac Newton as you walk over his grave countless times daily? He told me he was not aware of Sir Isaac Newton teachings on the Trinity where he believed it was a great hoax by the first Trinitarians in the fourth century.
And as I had pointed this out to him he promised me he would read the research by Sir Isaac Newton on the Trinity.
So if you find Reverend Mark Lane Smith, at Westminster Abbey? Please do ask him, did you read the research by Sir Isaac Newton on the Trinity that you promised Simon Brown you would do?
Please let me know what he says to you.

I am absolutely flabbergasted to how and why millions of Trinitarians believe and follow the Trinity doctoring and very clearly demonstrate by their own confession how they cannot agree on what they believe, neither understand what they believe, neither can they prove what they believe, which is why the Trinity faith are forced to say: THE TRINITY IS A MYSTERY, to justify their false doctrine.



I wonder who’s worse?
1. Atheist who say GOD does not exist?
2. Or Trinitarians who believe in a Trinity GOD that does not exist?

Put not your trust in princes, in a son of man, in whom there is no salvation.
 Psalm 146:3


Please may I leave you with some quotes from Newton on the Trinity. 
Sir Isaac Newton And Albert Einstein Faith in God.
Portrait of Isaac Newton (1642-1727). /Photographer http://www.newton.cam.ac.uk/art/portrait.html. Artist Sir Godfrey Kneller (1646–1723)

Click on image above to read about Sir Isaac Newton And Albert Einstein Faith in God.
Was one of history’s greatest scientists, Sir Isaac Newton correct in saying; Trinitarians were mistaken and misguided in its true interpretation of Christianity?

Here is Newton's list:-
1. The word God is nowhere in the scriptures used to signify more than one of the three persons at once.
2. The word God put absolutely without restriction to the Son or Holy Ghost doth always signify the Father from one end of the scriptures to the other.
3. Whenever it is said in the scriptures that there is but one God, it is meant the Father.
4. When, after some heretics had taken Christ for a mere man and others for the supreme God, St John in his Gospel endeavoured to state his nature so that men might have from thence a right apprehension of him and avoid those heresies and to that end calls him the word or logos: we must suppose that he intended that term in the sense that it was taken in the world before he used it when in like manner applied to an intelligent being. For if the Apostles had not used words as they found them how could they expect to have been rightly understood. Now the term logos before St John wrote, was generally used in the sense of the Platonists, when applied to an intelligent being and the Arians understood it in the same sense, and therefore theirs is the true sense of St John.
5. The Son in several places confesseth his dependence on the will of the Father.
6. The Son confesseth the Father greater, then calls him his God etc.
7. The Son acknowledgeth the original prescience of all future things to be in the Father only.
8. There is nowhere mention of a human soul in our Saviour besides the word, by the meditation of which the word should be incarnate. But the word itself was made flesh and took upon him the form of a servant.
9. It was the son of God which He sent into the world and not a human soul that suffered for us. If there had been such a human soul in our Saviour, it would have been a thing of too great consequence to have been wholly omitted by the Apostles.
10. It is a proper epithet of the Father to be called almighty. For by God almighty we always understand the Father. Yet this is not to limit the power of the Son. For he doth whatsoever he seeth the Father do; but to acknowledge that all power is originally in the Father and that the Son hath power in him but what he derives fro the Father, for he professes that of himself he can do nothing.
11. The Son in all things submits his will to the will of the Father, which could be unreasonable if he were equal to the Father.
12. The union between him and the Father he interprets to be like that of the saints with one another. That is in agreement of will and counsel.